The abandoned settlement of Monson, New Hampshire holds a special place in the history of New Hampshire. What was once a community full of life and activity now serves as a silent witness to the passage of time. Its weathered structures and empty streets speak volumes about the changing fortunes of American settlements.
County: Not available
Zip Code: Not available
Latitude / Longitude: Not available
Elevation: Not available
Time Zone: Eastern (EST) (UTC-5)
Established: Not available
Disestablished: Not available
Comments: Not available
Remains: Not available
Current Status: Not available
Remarks: Archaeological studies of Monson have yielded valuable artifacts that help tell the story of early life in New Hampshire. These findings contribute to our understanding of settlement patterns and daily life during this formative period.
Monson: New Hampshire’s Colonial Ghost Town
Nestled between the modern towns of Hollis and Milford in southern New Hampshire lies one of the state’s most fascinating historical enigmas the ghost town of Monson. Unlike many abandoned settlements that flourished before declining, Monson represents a rare example of a colonial-era community that struggled from its inception, ultimately disappearing entirely from the map. Today, this forgotten settlement offers a unique window into early New England colonial life and the challenges faced by frontier settlers in the 18th century.
Origins and Early Settlement
Monson’s story begins in 1735 when six settlers from Massachusetts and Canada purchased land that was then part of Massachusetts Bay Colony. In 1737, these pioneers and their families moved to the area, establishing what would become New Hampshire’s first inland colonial settlement. The timing of Monson’s founding placed it at a pivotal moment in New England’s colonial history just before the border between Massachusetts and New Hampshire would be redrawn, unexpectedly altering the settlement’s political affiliation.
The original land grant covered an impressive 17,000 acres, and the settlers quickly set about the arduous work of transforming wilderness into a functioning community. They cleared forests, built simple homes, and established the rudimentary infrastructure necessary for survival on the colonial frontier. Archaeological evidence and historical records indicate that the settlement eventually grew to include several family homesteads clustered relatively close together, following the traditional New England village pattern.
Among the earliest families to establish themselves in Monson were the Goulds, Wallingfords, Nevins, Bayleys, and Browns. These pioneering households formed the core of the settlement’s small community. Thomas Nevins emerged as a prominent figure, later serving as a sergeant in the French and Indian War and eventually losing three sons in the American Revolution. Dr. John Brown established himself as the settlement’s physician, notable for owning a fancy chaise carriage that became famous throughout the region a rare luxury in frontier New Hampshire.
Joshua Bailey and his family experienced the precariousness of frontier life when their home was destroyed by fire, though remarkably all eleven of his children escaped unharmed. Richard Clarke was another influential early settler who contributed to the community’s development. These families and others worked to transform the wilderness into productive farmland, though they would soon discover the limitations of the local environment.
Political Transitions and Challenges
In 1741, just four years after Monson’s establishment, a significant political change occurred that would have lasting implications for the settlement. The colonial borders between Massachusetts and New Hampshire were adjusted, and Monson suddenly found itself within New Hampshire’s territory rather than remaining part of Massachusetts as its founders had expected. This unexpected transition required the settlers to adapt to a different colonial government with its own laws, taxes, and administrative structures.
The border adjustment coincided with other challenges that began to plague the fledgling community. Perhaps most significantly, the settlers discovered that the soil quality in Monson was poor compared to other New England settlements. The rocky, thin soil made agriculture difficult and limited crop yields, creating economic hardship for families dependent on farming for their livelihood. This agricultural limitation would prove to be one of the most persistent obstacles to Monson’s long-term viability.
Additionally, Monson faced the typical frontier challenges of isolation, harsh weather, and limited resources. The settlement’s inland location, away from navigable waterways, restricted trade opportunities and made transportation of goods more difficult than in coastal or riverine communities. Winter isolation, summer diseases, and the constant work of frontier life created a precarious existence for Monson’s residents.
Community Structure and Daily Life
Archaeological investigations and historical records provide fascinating glimpses into daily life in Monson during its brief existence. The settlement developed as a loose cluster of homesteads rather than a densely populated village. Each family typically occupied a modest wooden home with a stone foundation and cellar, surrounded by cleared fields for agriculture and livestock.
Intriguingly, Monson never developed the full complement of public buildings and institutions typical of successful New England towns. The settlement never built a school, meeting hall, or church institutions that formed the backbone of most colonial communities. The only public structure identified in Monson was a pound for containing stray cattle, suggesting that livestock management was a significant concern for the community.
The absence of these key community buildings hints at Monson’s struggle to establish itself as a permanent settlement. Without a meetinghouse or church, residents likely traveled to neighboring communities for religious services and town meetings, further weakening Monson’s independent identity and social cohesion. The lack of a school suggests that formal education was limited, with children either receiving instruction at home or traveling elsewhere for schooling.
Daily life for Monson’s residents centered around agricultural labor and domestic work. Men cleared land, built and maintained structures, tended livestock, and worked the fields. Women managed households, prepared food, made clothing, and raised children. The seasonal rhythms of planting, harvesting, food preservation, and winter preparation structured the community’s calendar, as they did throughout colonial New England.
Material culture recovered from archaeological investigations at Monson reveals a modest standard of living typical of frontier settlements. Ceramic fragments, glass shards, metal tools, and other artifacts suggest that residents had access to some imported goods but primarily relied on locally produced items for daily use. The presence of Dr. Brown’s chaise carriage stands out as an unusual luxury in this otherwise utilitarian context.
The Mystery of Abandonment
The most intriguing aspect of Monson’s history is its relatively rapid abandonment. By 1770, just 33 years after its founding, the settlement was effectively dissolved, with its territory absorbed into surrounding towns. The precise reasons for Monson’s failure continue to puzzle historians and archaeologists, with several theories offering possible explanations for the community’s demise.
The poor quality of the soil is frequently cited as a primary factor in Monson’s abandonment. The rocky, thin soil of southern New Hampshire presented significant challenges for agriculture, especially compared to more fertile areas in the region. After years of struggling to produce adequate crops, many families may have decided to relocate to areas with better agricultural potential.
Political discord may have also contributed to Monson’s dissolution. The unexpected transfer from Massachusetts to New Hampshire jurisdiction created administrative complications and potentially divided loyalties among residents. Historical records suggest that disagreements over governance, taxation, and boundary issues created tensions within the community and with neighboring settlements.
Economic factors likely played a significant role as well. Monson’s inland location limited trade opportunities, and the settlement never developed industries that might have supplemented agricultural income. As more established towns in the region grew and offered greater economic opportunities, Monson’s residents may have been drawn away by better prospects elsewhere.
Some historians have suggested that the mounting costs of maintaining an independent town including road maintenance, poor relief, and other public expenses became unsustainable for Monson’s small population. The lack of public buildings suggests that the community struggled to fund even basic infrastructure, making consolidation with neighboring towns an attractive option.
The combination of these factors poor soil, political complications, economic limitations, and administrative costs created a perfect storm that ultimately led to Monson’s dissolution. In 1770, the settlement was officially disbanded, with its territory divided among the surrounding towns of Hollis, Milford, Amherst, and Brookline. The families who had called Monson home either relocated to these neighboring communities or moved further afield in search of better opportunities.
Rediscovery and Preservation
After its abandonment, Monson faded from memory, its stone foundations and cellar holes gradually reclaimed by the New England forest. For more than two centuries, the site remained largely undisturbed, known primarily to local residents and historians with a particular interest in the region’s past. This period of obscurity inadvertently preserved Monson’s archaeological record, creating a time capsule of early colonial life.
The modern chapter of Monson’s story began in 1998 when the abandoned settlement faced a new threat a proposed 28-lot subdivision that would have destroyed its historical remains. This development plan catalyzed a remarkable grassroots preservation effort led by local residents Russ and Geri Dickerman, who recognized the site’s historical significance and mobilized to save it.
The Dickermans’ initiative grew into a broader campaign involving local residents, the Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests, the State Division of Historical Resources, and Inherit New Hampshire. This coalition successfully raised funds to purchase the property, protecting it from development. The Dickermans themselves contributed significantly to the preservation effort by donating 125 acres of their own land to the cause.
In 2008, the preservation area expanded further when the Town of Milford required a neighboring subdivision developer to configure their open space to connect directly with the existing Monson reservation. This arrangement added 47 acres to the protected area, creating a substantial conservation zone around the historical site.
Today, the Forest Society oversees the stewardship of Monson Center, managing its rolling fields, forests, walking trails, and historical artifacts for public education and enjoyment. The site encompasses 269 acres of protected land, ensuring that this unique piece of New Hampshire’s colonial history will remain preserved for future generations.
Archaeological Significance
Monson Center is considered by leading archaeologists to be one of the most significant archaeological sites in New England. Its importance stems from several factors that make it uniquely valuable for understanding colonial New England history.
First, the site’s relatively brief period of occupation from 1737 to 1770 provides a well-defined chronological window that allows archaeologists to study material culture from a specific period of colonial development. Unlike many historical sites that were continuously occupied and modified over centuries, Monson offers a clearer picture of mid-18th century frontier life.
Second, the site’s abandonment and subsequent lack of development preserved archaeological features that might otherwise have been destroyed by later construction. The stone foundations, cellar holes, wells, and other structural remains provide valuable information about colonial building techniques and settlement patterns. The original road network remains visible, offering insights into transportation and community planning in early New Hampshire.
Third, Monson’s status as a “failed” settlement makes it particularly interesting to historians studying the factors that determined community success or failure in colonial New England. By comparing Monson to more successful contemporary settlements, researchers can better understand the environmental, economic, and social conditions necessary for frontier communities to thrive.
Archaeological investigations at Monson have uncovered a wealth of artifacts that illuminate daily life in the settlement. Ceramic fragments, glass bottles, metal tools, buttons, buckles, and other personal items provide tangible connections to the people who briefly called Monson home. These artifacts help researchers reconstruct patterns of consumption, trade networks, and domestic activities in the settlement.
The archaeological record also reveals evidence of the settlers’ efforts to adapt to their environment. Stone walls marking property boundaries and field divisions crisscross the landscape, testifying to the labor invested in clearing the rocky soil for agriculture. Wells, root cellars, and other features demonstrate how residents managed water resources and food storage in the challenging New England climate.
Monson Center Today
Today, visitors to Monson Center can explore a remarkably well-preserved colonial landscape that offers a tangible connection to New Hampshire’s past. A 3-mile trail system leads through the property, connecting seven original home sites with biographical markers that tell the stories of the families who once lived there. These interpretive elements help visitors understand the human dimension of Monson’s history, putting names and stories to the stone foundations and cellar holes that remain.
The landscape itself is a compelling historical document. Well-maintained open fields surrounded by stone walls evoke the agricultural setting of colonial Monson, while the original East and West Monson Roads provide the same pathways that residents once traveled. The juxtaposition of these human elements with the returning forest creates a powerful illustration of the temporary nature of human settlement and the resilience of the natural environment.
Beyond its historical features, Monson Center offers significant natural attractions. The trail system converges at a sprawling beaver wetland that hosts an active heron rookery in early summer. Benches near the water provide hikers with spots to rest while observing wildlife. The property supports a diverse ecosystem that includes forests, fields, and wetlands, creating habitat for numerous plant and animal species.
Recreational opportunities at Monson Center include hiking, birdwatching, cross-country skiing, snowshoeing, and photography. The site’s combination of historical interest and natural beauty makes it appealing to a wide range of visitors. Educational programs and guided tours are occasionally offered, providing deeper insights into the site’s significance and the ongoing work to preserve and interpret it.
For those interested in a more structured experience, the Forest Society has developed a mobile application that provides an interpretive tour of Monson Center. This digital guide allows visitors to follow the trail while accessing explanations of natural and cultural sites along the way, enhancing understanding of the property’s features and history.
Historical Lessons and Legacy
Monson’s brief existence and subsequent abandonment offer valuable insights into the challenges and contingencies of colonial settlement in New England. The community’s story complicates simplistic narratives of steady frontier expansion, reminding us that many early settlements struggled and some ultimately failed despite the determination and hard work of their founders.
The environmental limitations that contributed to Monson’s demise highlight the crucial role that natural resources played in determining settlement viability. Poor soil quality and limited access to transportation routes created obstacles that Monson’s residents ultimately could not overcome. This environmental dimension of colonial history reminds us that human settlement patterns were shaped not only by political and economic factors but also by the fundamental characteristics of the land itself.
Monson’s political history particularly its unexpected transfer from Massachusetts to New Hampshire jurisdiction illustrates how colonial boundaries and governance structures were still evolving in the mid-18th century. The settlement existed during a formative period when the political geography of New England was being defined, with lasting consequences for community development and identity.
The preservation effort that saved Monson Center from development in the late 1990s represents an important chapter in New Hampshire’s conservation history. The successful grassroots campaign demonstrated the power of community action to protect historical and natural resources, setting a precedent for similar preservation initiatives throughout the region.
Today, Monson’s legacy lives on in multiple forms. The physical site provides a tangible connection to New Hampshire’s colonial past, allowing visitors to walk the same paths and view the same landscapes that settlers experienced nearly three centuries ago. Archaeological research at Monson continues to yield new insights into colonial life, contributing to scholarly understanding of early American history.
Perhaps most importantly, Monson’s story has been reclaimed from obscurity and integrated into New Hampshire’s broader historical narrative. What was once a forgotten failure is now recognized as a valuable historical resource that enriches our understanding of the state’s development. The ghost town’s preservation ensures that future generations will have the opportunity to learn from this unique chapter in New Hampshire’s past.
Monson in Regional Context
Monson’s history is intertwined with the broader patterns of settlement and development in southern New Hampshire during the colonial period. The community’s establishment in 1737 came during a significant phase of frontier expansion, as English settlements pushed inland from the coast and river valleys. This expansion was driven by population growth in established towns and the resulting demand for new agricultural land.
The border adjustment of 1741 that transferred Monson from Massachusetts to New Hampshire was part of a larger redefinition of colonial boundaries that affected numerous communities. This political reorganization reflected the evolving administrative structure of British North America and the increasing definition of what would eventually become state boundaries.
Monson’s dissolution in 1770 and the absorption of its territory into surrounding towns Hollis, Milford, Amherst, and Brookline illustrates a common pattern of administrative consolidation in colonial New England. As the region’s settlement pattern matured, smaller or struggling communities were often incorporated into more viable neighboring towns, creating the municipal boundaries that largely persist to the present day.
The preservation of Monson Center connects to broader conservation efforts throughout New Hampshire and New England. The site exemplifies a growing recognition of the historical and ecological value of undeveloped land, particularly areas with significant cultural resources. Similar projects throughout the region have protected other historical landscapes, creating a network of preserved sites that collectively tell the story of New England’s development.
Visiting Monson Center
For those interested in experiencing this unique historical site firsthand, Monson Center is open to the public year-round. The property is located in Hollis and Milford, New Hampshire, with parking available on Adams Road. A kiosk near the parking area provides orientation information, and trail maps are available at the “Gould House” site.
The main trails follow the former East and West Monson Roads, making them relatively wide and easy to navigate. Narrower trails branch off from these main routes, but all eventually reconnect, making it difficult to get lost. The terrain is generally flat to gently rolling, with some uneven surfaces around the historical features.
Visitors should be aware of certain guidelines when exploring Monson Center. As a protected historical and natural area, the site has restrictions designed to preserve its resources. These include prohibitions on camping, fires, motorized vehicles, and bicycles. Visitors are asked to carry out all trash, stay on designated trails, and avoid disturbing plants, animals, or cultural features.
The best times to visit depend on personal interests. Spring brings wildflowers and returning migratory birds, while summer offers lush greenery and active wildlife at the beaver pond. Fall provides colorful foliage against the backdrop of stone walls and cellar holes, creating particularly photogenic scenes. Winter visits allow for snowshoeing and cross-country skiing on the trail network, though visitors should note that parking areas may not be plowed consistently during winter months.
Conclusion: A Window into Colonial New Hampshire
Monson represents a rare and valuable window into New Hampshire’s colonial past—a community frozen in time at the moment of its abandonment, then preserved for centuries before being rediscovered and protected for future generations. Its brief existence from 1737 to 1770 coincided with a formative period in American history, spanning the final decades of unquestioned British rule before the revolutionary era would transform the political landscape.
The ghost town’s story reminds us that the colonial settlement of New England was not a simple narrative of steady progress and growth. It was instead a complex process of adaptation, struggle, and sometimes failure, as communities grappled with environmental limitations, political changes, and economic challenges. For every successful town that grew into a thriving center, others like Monson faded away, their brief histories nearly lost to time.
Thanks to the preservation efforts of the late 20th century, Monson’s physical remains and historical significance have been saved from both development and obscurity. Today, the ghost town serves as both an archaeological treasure and a public resource a place where visitors can walk through a landscape shaped by colonial settlers nearly three centuries ago and contemplate the transient nature of human settlement against the enduring backdrop of the New England landscape.
In its quiet fields and stone-lined cellar holes, in its ancient roads and boundary walls, Monson continues to tell its story a brief but significant chapter in the long history of New Hampshire and New England. Though its residents departed long ago, their legacy remains in this unique ghost town, preserved as a testament to the challenges and aspirations of colonial life on the New Hampshire frontier.
Sources:
https://www.forestsociety.org/property/monson-center
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monson,_New_Hampshire
https://www.nhmagazine.com/the-mystery-of-monson/
https://nhtourguide.com/wp/places/hollis/monson-nh-an-historic-nh-town/
https://nutfieldgenealogy.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-abandoned-town-of-monson-new.html
